Отзывы Whiskybase
учтено 80 заметок · текстовых 60 · полный lossless-снимок WB (полнота подтверждена)
Суммаризация отзывов
Отзывы на этот релиз резко расходятся: одни находят его необычным и интересным, другие — молодым, несбалансированным и похожим скорее на джин, чем на виски.
развернуть подробно
В отзывах доминирует необычный «лесной» профиль с хвойными и травянистыми нотами — сосновые иглы, можжевельник, тимьян, розмарин, мята, кориандр, иногда лёгкий дым и влажная лесная подстилка. Часто это вызывает ассоциации с джином, а не с виски, вплоть до прямых сравнений с джином в носу и во вкусе. Часть дегустаторов считает эксперимент удачным и интересным, отмечая сладость, мёд, карамель, цитрус, солод, дуб и хорошее развитие после открытия бутылки, а также гармонию и мощный финиш. Другие называют результат неудачным: вкус плоский, тело слабое, финиш короткий или сухой, присутствуют горечь, «парфюмерность», «мыльная» нота и резкий алкогольный тон; звучат оценки вплоть до «провала», «не виски», «джина среди виски», сравнений с банным маслом и лечебной конфетой от кашля, а также заявления, что это худший Glenmorangie из пробованных. Отдельно критикуют цену: при стоимости около 80–90 евро его оценивают как максимум повседневный виски за ~46 евро, сомневаясь в оправданности цены; упоминаются также чрезмерная «древесная»/щепковая нота и странный резиновый оттенок. Мнения о балансе и качестве расходятся: одни хвалят деликатность, мягкость и традиционное хайлендское солодовое ядро, другие указывают на дисбаланс, молодость, спиртуозность и отсутствие сладости и дуба.
собрано 60/80 текстовых отзывов · полный lossless-снимок WB
· 2026-10-08T05:33:25Z · источник evidence
нос 83 · вкус 84 · финиш 84
нос 79 · вкус 78 · финиш 78
нос · вкус · финиш
нос 85 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
OK, this is a typical Glenmorangie. It cannot deny its origins either in the nose or in the mouth. Like most Glenmos, it remains soft and round. The alcohol tingles a little in the mouth. All in all, this special bottling does not offer any particularly outstanding aromas compared to the standard 10. However, the 10 also has the big problem that it is watered down to 40% ABV. This is different here, there is more pressure on the boiler. Yes, spruce needles and moss as well as herbs can be detected on the nose. The name says it all. But there is not much more than that compared to the 10er Additional impressions. However, in my opinion it doesn't have any off notes and it doesn't seem too bitter either. The Quinta Ruban or the Nectar d'or are of a different caliber, in a positive sense. This would be a decent everyday whisky, with no special aromas, no rough edges. The finish is medium long. An all-round relaxing dram, it would cost around 46 EUR at most. But 80 - 90 EUR? No thanks.
нос 81 · вкус 80 · финиш 79
Hmmm.. I don't quite understand the "criticism" here. This Glenmorangie is somehow a typical example of Dr. Bill Lumdsen - and not necessarily his worst experiment. What have we had: wild yeast, sticky sweets, Caucasian oak (sorry, that was Ardbeg...)... yes, it's not a "typical", delicate Glenmorangie - the "botanicals" give the otherwise very clean distillate a freshness, in which Herbal note on the nose, which is quite refreshing and different; the oak, the maltiness and the vanilla of a good single malt are also very present. I would give a few deductions for the lack of balance - overall, the "History of the Forest" seems a bit smokey and unpolished. Overall, however, a rather successful experiment. And in times of Macallan Concept or fine cocoa, there is simply no need to rant about the price-performance ratio...
нос 79 · вкус 80 · финиш 80
I’m shocked at how much I liked this. There’s a really interesting mix of flavours here. Despite the juniper, this tastes nothing like gin to me. It’s more like an ex-Islay-cask Ardmore (ashy smoke, herbs, mineral, greenness) with a bit of the woodsmoke and tart character of certain American single malts. It’s fascinating to drink, so much more memorable than the other two Tales, and pretty tasty to boot. If you’re ever tempted by that famous Glenmorangie Swamp Oak bottling, this will get you some of the way there.
нос 85 · вкус 82 · финиш 83
The nose is interesting, quite fresh, with mellow lemon and pine needles. Sweet dusty smoke. Nice oak, sandy side, red fruits, wild strawberries, blackberries, but it's a little unbalanced. A certain minerality, in a dry environment. In the mouth, it's very average, the alcohol stands out, some forest fragrances, but barely. Conifers. A little gasoline. The finale disappears very quickly, it has not yet arrived that it has already left. Bark, some nuts. Heather. The idea was good, but the whisky is less so. I liked the nose, despite some faults, but the mouth and the finish seemed to me to be of poor value. https://ilikesky2020.blogspot.com/2023/06/glenmorangie-tale-of-forest.html
нос 84 · вкус 79 · финиш 80
Pine needles
In preparation for a tasting I led at Angels' Share in November 2022. Based on only one tasting - therefore not rated. Although it wasn't a very pleasant experience for most of the tasting attendees, I enjoyed it quite a bit. Definitely the most of all the "A Tale of ..." I've tasted so far. Maybe because I'm a gin fan. ;)
This bottling from the Tale of series lives up to its name in a rather simple way. From the outset, the whisky is very woody and extremely wood-chippy, reminding me of a visit to a carpenter and even more so of assembling a piece of furniture I purchased from the blue-yellow giant. The impressions and associations I associate with forests are largely lost, as is any substance or added value that would linger on the finish and beyond to properly celebrate the fairytale of the forest. A weakening whisky from the highly productive era of the whisky boom.
The nose is fresh, almost dirty/alcoholic, unusual, not like whisky should be. Not like Glenmorangie at all. Blind I would have guessed this is some entry level NAS Islay Whisky. The taste reminds me of gin. You dont drink gin neat. Not worth the stress on the liver. Young, bitter, weird. Glad it was a sample. I love new ideas, the botanicals could have been great in my imagination. Not sure if I want to laugh or to cry thinking about the 80€ per bottle. Love Glenmorangie, hate this Release.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 75 | dusty, herbal, spruce, juniper, hay |
| Вкус | 70 | mint, sand, heather, very herbal, light cough syrup, moth balls |
| Финиш | 70 | herbal, lightly grassy |
A beautiful magic tree
Hmm, experiments, it was interesting until I tried it.. The nose is really interesting, it took me to Ireland, but then... and then a young, simple and flat whisky, I didn't understand it in the evening... 21 20 20 20 81 I'll add - you can drink, and thank you for that... update - half a bottle - the same impressions, we finish it little by little.
нос 85 · вкус 82 · финиш 80
The noticeable alcohol content in the taste was disappointing, although it still allows you to easily determine exactly 46% even blindly. And even if I was just blind, I would have thought that this was some kind of smoke-maker from Mainland. The taste, unfortunately, is obviously alcoholic, so it doesn’t deserve any higher scores. 21 20 21 20
So I'm a real fan of the Glenmorangie Distillery. Nothing has disappointed me so far. The high stills have always ensured a particularly soft and well-balanced fabric. But this one... Sorry, that's nothing. Is Glenmorangie now also riding the wave of squeezing something into a bottle? Any new invention/experiment yet? Botanicals - it should have been clear to me. Not only does it smell like cheap gin, it also tastes the same. Without exaggerating, the worst Glenmorangie I've had in my glass so far. Luckily it was only a sample.
нос 80 · вкус 87 · финиш 85
This was a huge disappointment.
Smell and taste like Gin. Totally not me taste. Terrible
"A tale of the forest" After taking a sip, I understand why they use this name. I think it is good to open this once in a while, but not suitable for a daily drinker.)
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 90 | An invitation to the forest: Very refreshing, minty, and leafy. At the back, there is a little sweetness, balancing the strong notes at the front. |
| Вкус | 86 | Fresh and light at the beginning. Then, it turns to strong oaky note really fast. I certainly did not expect a 46% ABV whisky to have such impact. |
| Финиш | 85 | Not intense at all (A medium and a dry finish). It is oaky and malty. If the oaky note stays longer, it will become a little bit bitter. |
Quite a funky experience this experiment. It does bring an hint of smoke and an idea of gin... Juniper berries... Image that! Overall quite soft and pleasant.
нос 84 · вкус 83 · финиш 84
The limited edition bottle of 2022 where the drying of the grains has been accompanied by forest flowers and herbs.
20+21+21+20
8/7.5/8 // 8.8/8/8
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 88 | Mesquite. |
| Вкус | 80 | Smoke & spice, with dried herbs. |
| Финиш | 80 | Lovely with water. |
aroma: fresh and herbaceous, dried rosemary, thyme, sage, eucalyptus, mint, juniper, pine, vanilla, light smoke 86 taste: quite sharp, tannic, lots of ginger, peppermint, citrus peel, thyme, rosemary, pine branches, smoked ham, vanilla cream, maybe orange from afar 84 finish: not long, light, vanilla, pine branches, thyme, rosemary, oak notes 83 it's interesting, although it doesn't look like whisky at all
нос 86 · вкус 84 · финиш 83
нос 84 · вкус 83 · финиш 81
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 86 | fruity, herbal, slightly menthol-like Orange flavors mixed with a little pine needle oil Sweetness is clearly evident A great sniffer |
| Вкус | 87 | slightly peppery start Immediately herbs mixed with sweetness again --> kind of like cough drops :-)) becomes creamy and goes clearly into Riccola herbal sweets very interesting !! |
| Финиш | 86 | the herbal notes and sweetness and a slight pepperiness linger in the mouth At the very end the tannins come through - and last |
I could certainly taste the forest from this bottle. But I have a few doubts about whether it's the taste everyone is looking for in a whisky. The exploration of new things is very interesting.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 82 | Herb. |
| Вкус | 82 | Botanical Glenmorangie. |
| Финиш | 85 | Medium.Not a whisky feel. But maybe that's the new and better part. |
Wonderfull expression from Glenmorangie. Totally like it.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 90 | Malt, floral and a bit of smoky. |
| Вкус | 90 | spicy, floral and oaky. |
| Финиш | 80 | Long finish with orange, lemon. |
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 85 | Sweet pine and juniper syrup wrapped in light wood smoke (totally different as we know it), stale oranges, forest floor, malt, sponge cakes, some yeast dough, freshly cut wood, a small handful of aromatic herbs (mainly coriander, allspice, bay leaf, oregano ) a delicate note of spicy chili pepper in the background |
| Вкус | 81 | Citrus, a lot of woody notes, mainly juniper and pine, wrapped in minimal wood smoke, peppermint, orange peel, a note of yeast, a bit malty, a bit of honey, minimally nutty, a small handful of herbs, forest litter, grassy, delicate oak bitterness |
| Финиш | 80 | Long, citrus with peppermint, minimal oak bitterness, herbs |
Not good at all. Strange smell and taste. Rubber notes in the smell
[October 2022] What a strange experiment! They flavoured the whisky by "smoking" the barley with woodland botanicals' scent, I find this completely weird. I love such experiments as such, but I am not sure if I like the outcome too... ...no, as a drinker I do not. This is a truly unique profile I never had in a dram before which reminds me more of (excellent) gin than of malt whisky - and exactly this is the problem: I am into malt whisky and not into gin (despite I enjoy an iced gin-tonic on hot summer days from time to time). Maybe I should add some tonic water to this dram - no, forget that idea!
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 84 | The colour is amber, and the nose is ... unusual (to state it neutral). The dominating aromas I rather found in (excellent) gin with juniper berries, pinecones and menthol. The malt's aromas hide cowardly in the background, obviously they are afraid of the unknown intruders into their world. It is both fresh and interesting, but at the same it is rather bitter and still a little immature. I like it for curiosity, but I do not really enjoy nosing. |
| Вкус | 85 | The taste is about the same with a truly unique flavours profile I never had in a malt before. Again, on the first sip it reminds me more of a gin than a malt but after some chewing the malt flavours (barley sugars, honey, florals) leave their hideaway. It tastes quite perfumy with these flavours, and I always associate perfumes with soapiness (in drams). No, this dram is not soapy but somehow my taste buds active this linkage. Not a taste to enjoy, but it is very funny to explore (not kidding). |
| Финиш | 82 | The dram arrives with a rather disappointing mouthfeel (for a Glenmorangie) on my palate with some warming impressions but almost no coating effects. Hence the finish is quite short, and it stays on the bitter side of the profile with both tannins and the strange "woodland scents". Water strengthens the strange flavours both in the nose and on the palate, so if you like these add some. I prefer it neat. |
Very unpleasant on the palate, despite its rather interesting and different smoky and ashy nose. It's flat, really lacks in body and the finish does not develop anywhere. I did not like this edition at all.
Nose: green apple, lychee, initially also cheese and sweat, but that disappears again, pine, later very faint smoke, is that a heavily charred barrel or is it actually the distillate? I suspect the second. Little to no alcohol noticeable The longer in the glass, the more herbs and Allgäu mountain pine Taste: fairly mild beginning, yellow fruits, sweet, peaches, honeydew melon, also tart notes of sandalwood, sea buckthorn, subtle spiciness, something unspecifically ethereal Finish: stays mild and sweet, medium length at most Tip: Bourbon cask, 43-46%,,
нос 74 · вкус 80 · финиш 78
Golden color. It's not too oily.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 82 | Herbs. Lots of herbs. botany. Thyme and rosemary. Maybe marjoram. Oregano. I don't think I've ever had such a herbal nose in whisky. Subtle hints of vanilla underneath. A pinch of spices. A pinch of white pepper. However, herbs definitely dominate. Black pepper. |
| Вкус | 81 | Lots of herbs and spices again. Nutmeg. Allspice. Thyme. Rosemary. A pinch of spices. White pepper. Caramel underneath. Delicate oiliness. Light spiciness. |
| Финиш | 81 | Warming and spicy at the beginning. Slightly, not very much, but still. Caramel. Salt. Salty caramel. Allspice, so chewed up. Spices. White pepper. Medium to medium-long finish. |
Unfortunately I forgot to write a detailed review, so just off the top of my head. The whisky itself wasn't necessarily bad, but when I was tasting it I kept having associations with a pine needle bath oil additive, which really bothered me. From memory, I would give him even fewer points than the 80 points awarded at the time, but I'm afraid that wouldn't be fair or honest, hence the points awarded at the time.
Amazing!! Great one :) such a different one from other glens. A lot of forest, some smoke, herbs, fruits. Very interesting one :)
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 83 | Sweet, Smokey, herby, pine, great choice. |
| Вкус | 82 | A lot of different things - much of herbs, some pine, forest, some pitfire! I am really nicely suprised |
| Финиш | 82 | Great one, long, Smokey, woody |
The aroma and taste are fairly standard Glenmorangie flavors. I didn't detect any particularly strong herbal notes, but there was an extreme woody character—imagine the smell of wood shavings in a carpenter's workshop. There were also vague fruity and sweet notes, along with a noticeable alcohol flavor. Bill Leighton's experimental product's packaging and flavor descriptions were quite intriguing, but after drinking it, I don't think it's a success...
Pine needles, juniper, and coriander, supported by chestnuts, damp forest floor, and a subtle hint of wood smoke... menthol, bitter orange, and liquorice, quite a pleasant whisky.
нос 83 · вкус 84 · финиш 83
Somehow an exciting whisky that also offers a lot of quality, but unfortunately I don't have the openness for its aromas today. Before this one I had a Ben Bracken NAS Speysider (WB162499) from Lidl which I gave 76 points. But I liked Ben Bracken's nose better at first. Nevertheless, I find it exciting what the whisky says: the "clou" was that Glenmorangie kilned the malt for this whisky using botanicals. And yes, the juniper used and also the pine needles have been transferred to the distillate and can be found in the nose and also on the palate. Of course, this also means that this is not a whisky aroma profile in the classic sense. If you want to describe it positively, you could say that this is an unconventional whisky. People who like all the new types of beer and beer experiments from all over the world ("hipsters") may also be interested in dealing with such whisky experiments and also have the patience to develop a taste for these aromas. I'm rather narrow minded and old-fashioned, but would still try a sample of this whisky again from time to time.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 83 | The nose has very clear and prominent notes of gin botanicals; here indeed and especially juniper and pine needles. The texture of the whisky is very clean, creamy-oily and the distillate was really good, but I don't like the flavors in a whisky. Over time, the whisky develops a beautiful harmony and the aromas no longer seem so strange to me. Today and only with a small sample that's still too special for me. But the whisky has quality. |
| Вкус | 78 | The attack is round, voluminous and again there is a lot of juniper, wood and unfortunately also many aromas of "Booze". That's definitely too special for me for the first time and not really round either. This is where the experiment failed for me at the latest. In contrast to other whiskys, which I don't like, I drink the sample here, because the whisky itself is very good - apart from the aromas. It sounds weird, but that's how it tastes. |
| Финиш | 80 | The mouthfeel is very good, again confirming that the distillate (as with most Glenmorangie) was very good. The finish is medium at best and lingers with a dry note of wet pine needles. |
нос 77 · вкус 76 · финиш 77
Mainly (pine)wood and menthol-like notes.
нос 65 · вкус 60 · финиш 65
Suggests a version of Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition, depicting a walk through a forest stretching between distilleries. Mostly kiln-derived narrative and structure. Most likely matured in mostly refill ex-bourbon American oak casks. Non-chill-filtered. Coloured. Thick slowly forming primary legs. Mid-size secondary legs. Droplets.
Honeydew, caramel, eucalyptus, juniper berries, lavender, pine tree shavings, orange skin shavings, coriander, hint of raspberries, lightly smoky heathered peat, hint of marshmallows, and finishing with roasted chestnuts. This is a good and interesting whisky. The next day after trying it, it seems sweeter, punchier, with the botanicals balanced better.
нос 86 · вкус 87 · финиш 85
While the nose is exceptional and quite appetizing, the penetrating juniper that settles on the palate is simply creepy. The gin among whiskies. What is Dr. thinking? Bill Lumsden there.
A very interesting Glenmorangie. When the bottle is freshly opened, the aroma and taste are initially not round. With an alcoholic tinge and a hint of smoke like an HP or a Springbank. If you only have one sample to taste, you won't really realize its potential. After approx. 3-4 weeks in the opened bottle and a slightly reduced fill level, it has harmonized and impresses with a beautiful aroma and intense sweetness in the nose and mouth. A great mouthfeel and surprisingly powerful in the finish for a Glenmorangie with pleasant wood. No bitterness, no sharpness and that gentle smoke that you only perceive as an extension of the complexity. And no, I don't like gin... After a slight initial disappointment, I actually bought it again. A successful experiment for me!
From a scent that can at least be described as exciting to a less than great taste to a disgusting finish for me. The author of this story just messed up the arc of suspense. A Fail of Forest!
Ricola herbal candy meets cough drop with a strong alcohol tinge on the palate. Unfortunately not to my liking
нос 86 · вкус 80 · финиш 78
нос 84 · вкус 84 · финиш 83
нос 87 · вкус 84 · финиш 85
Still fruit on the nose, which after a while becomes a wet forest testicle. That could be interesting. After that, however, comes very little. 61-70 - Okay, but not more than 1 dram
нос 70 · вкус 63 · финиш 59
n: real herbal notes! meadow, leaves, honey, dried herbs, vegetalnes, peppery, caramel, lapsang souchong, light smoke, hint of smoke & citrus t: sweet, herbal, meadow, smoke, spicy a: dried herbs, light smoke, old wood, caramel, lapsang souchong
A very interesting whisky for Glenmorangie. In this case, the forest marketing actually fits the contents of the bottle: At first glance, the whisky reminds me of damp moss and a humid coniferous forest. With a little more time, it swings very clearly in the direction of juniper and, in addition to impressions of coniferous trees, develops dominant gin aromas, so that after about 15 minutes in the glass it is more of a gin than a whisky. The malt is not very balanced - sweet aromas or a hint of acidity or oak aromas are not really to be found. You can definitely try this Glenmorangie - you really don't need a bottle for my taste, especially not at this price. The Glenmorangie house follows the marketing line of its parent company: Chick presented quantity, which is said to be very limited, instead of quality. Thumbs down. Without the price: 80/100 - with price: 60/100 - so here 70/100.
50+2+9+10+4
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 84 | Lots of oranges, fir needle syrup, fresh red pine bark, dry leaves, mulch, fresh sawdust, it seems that there is a percentage of smoke hidden there. |
| Вкус | 82 | Yeast dough, sponge cake, vanilla, carnmel, vanilla pudding, some coconut flakes, citrus fruits, lemon, lime, a bit of bitterness, young walnuts. |
| Финиш | 81 | Rather short, simple, warming, dry, vinous, creamy, advocat, even a lot of malt. |
Conclusions. Personally, I enjoyed this experiment, despite the obvious inconsistencies and criticisms. Overall, it's pleasant and more reminiscent of a delicate smoked whisky, enveloped in atypical aromas of dried and fresh herbs. Score: 83/84
This alcoholic beverage doesn't really remind me of whisky. In the nose you have coniferous trees that are found intensively in the taste. Sorry, but a no-go for whisky
This seems to be a very polarizing whisky. I like it though. I can see why some may find the flavours of the smoked botanicals offputting in this whisky - these flavours are not what I've found in any other whisky, ever. But for me, what balances this out is the sturdy, pleasantly bitter-orange-oak highland malty core that is definitely a traditional highland character. So when the two elements are infused - delicate spring-fresh botanicals with a traditional highland malt character, I found it makes for something very interesting and very enjoyable. I also found that this whisky seems to be very well matured - no spiky alcohol, and great development of flavour into the finish, similar to slightly older whiskies. Impressive for such a reasonably priced whisky. This is definitely a "delicate", "floral", "fresh" whisky so all of the above is delivered in a very gentle way - this is not a whisky that is in-your-face with any all-consuming power. Another reason why maybe some have rated this lower? I do think that this whisky could have been a monster if bottled at cask strength and non-chill-filtered. But that's not Glenmorangie's style I suppose, and I guess at this price it's a reasonable trade-off.
"INSPIRED BY THE EVERCHANGING NATURAL WONDER ENCOUNTRED WHILE WANDERING IN THE FOREST. Evoking the scents, sounds and sights of the forest, the single malt surrounds your senses with aromas of pine, juniper and coriander, laced with wisps of smoke. Then tastes of deep-green eucalyptus, lit by rays of bitter orange, drift to a slow, gently oaky finish." N: Young. The spirit stands out quite strongly with it's always yeasty aspect. It's quite interesting. Pinewood with honey. Grass and some watery oak. Some banana appears with bursts of vanilla and coconut. Wood spices, some smoke and juniper berries. (82) P: Old books. Hint of smoke. Grass and earth. Dust. Yeast and malt. Dry wood notes. Blue cheese. Some banana orange peel and anise. Pine wood and juniper again. Quite dry also. Not my cup of tea sorry. It's interesting but I can't say I'm intrigued or that I would want another dram. (78) F: Citrus thang, pine wood, anise, earthy and dry. No thank you. (77) I ain't saying that this is bad. All I say is that I don't like this. For some other it might be a great dram. "Fos fos szar szar fos szar fos." 82 / 78 / 77 = 79 pts / 100
Interesting Glenmorangie, the packaging certainly matches the content; even if I don't necessarily have to think of a walk in the forest. The flavors are unusual, not commonplace, and mostly difficult to define. Not bad in quality, but not entirely to my liking - 01/07/2023
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 83 | Light and fine herbal aromas, pine needles, menthol, bergamot, a soapy, tart perfume note resonates that I would classify as coriander, cold bath additive, chocolate with pieces of fruit (raspberry), the empty glass provides notes of dried herbs and multivitamin |
| Вкус | 82 | Initially tart, grassy, woody, sweetness comes quickly, malt sweetness, block chocolate, herbs, pine needles, soapy, oily, very creamy mouthfeel |
| Финиш | 81 | Medium length, dry, pine needles, soapy, lavender, oak |
a failed experiment... i didn't get it...
нос 78 · вкус 78 · финиш 77
Honestly horrible. Not sure the use case, tastes more like gin than scotch. Flavors do not go well together.
A simple, woody scent, coffee/cocoa Taste Woody, earthy, slightly smoky, not particularly complex Finish Short, slightly fruity
нос 84 · вкус 82 · финиш 85
Can be done, does not have to be. For gin drinkers looking for an alternative. Will definitely go well in a cocktail.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 82 | In the nose, initially the pleasant thick fruit wall typical of Glenmorangie on pear, apricot and orange. Over time, however, the botanicals used are inevitably added, giving it a light gin touch, as well as pine needles and wild berries. Unfortunately, this makes it look a bit spritty and cheap to me (I'm not a gin friend). But it may be that it's just a matter of the head. |
| Вкус | 80 | Here, too, the herbal, unusual forest notes follow a mild, creamy, fruity start. Unfortunately strange. |
| Финиш | 79 | Rather short, alcoholic and spicy. |
.
S 7 Tasted blind. Complex and very volatile, getting better as it breathes. As I was told, the malt used here was kilned with juniper berries. A very experimental and unique one (+), definitely worth a try. [78-82] I'll gladly welcome another dram. N 24 Oily. Lightly rubbery (-). Cardboard. 10 minutes in, fruits, wet malt, old oak. P 26 A bit vegetal at first. Then slowly becomes fruity and smoky. Now getting dirty malt and pine wood. F 25 Mid, slightly dry finish. Light smoke lingers.
INSPIRED BY THE EVER-CHANGING WONDER OF NATURE YOU MEET WHILE WALKING IN THE FOREST. Evoking the smells, sounds and sights of the forest, the single malt surrounds your senses with aromas of pine, juniper and coriander laced with wisps of smoke. Then the flavors of deep green eucalyptus, illuminated by rays of bitter orange, drift into a slow, softly oaky finish. The color is deep gold