учтено 17 заметок · текстовых 5 · полный lossless-снимок WB (полнота подтверждена)
Суммаризация отзывов
Отзывы сходятся в том, что дым здесь сдержанный и остаётся на фоне, а доминирует винная бочка из-под бордо; при этом виски требует времени в бокале, чтобы раскрыться.
развернуть подробно
В отзывах неоднократно отмечается, что торфяной дым присутствует, но остаётся довольно сдержанным и уходит на второй план, тогда как винная бочка из-под бордо доминирует. Один отзыв описывает дым как «живой и яркий», другой — как «очень-очень тонкий», едва заметный в носу, а третий прямо говорит, что винная отделка перекрывает дым и заключённые в нём дистиллерии. Вкусовая палитра, упомянутая в отзывах, включает тёмный шоколад, кожу, табак, оттенки старого кабинета, пыли и слегка затхлые ноты, а также пряный сухой финиш; при этом один отзыв называет виски «закрытым» и «резким» без глубины, а другой — «вкусным, но взаимозаменяемым» без «вау-эффекта».
Отдельно подчёркивается, что виски требует времени: после второго дегустирования с отдыхом в бокале около 45 минут — полутора часов он раскрывается значительно лучше, и в нём проявляются качества, ожидаемые от действительно старого виски. Вместе с тем один отзыв указывает, что ароматы кажутся слишком «старыми», затхлыми и тяжёлыми для его личного вкуса, хотя для ценителей зрелых виски с кожей, табаком и сдержанной дымной нотой эта бутылка может быть worthwhile. Также упоминается информация о составе: виски из Ardbeg и Laphroaig, 27 лет, 55,6% ABV, 229 бутылок, последние шесть лет в барриках Premier Cru Bordeaux.
собрано 5/17 текстовых отзывов · полный lossless-снимок WB
· 2026-09-23T21:21:52Z · источник evidence
Delicious, but interchangeable. For me it's the wine barrel finish. For me, the "wow factor" is missing. Could also be younger. Many wine finishes can mask youth. Overall well integrated alcohol. Dominant wine finish. Smoke is still present and noticeable. For me, the wine finish of the smoke and therefore also the distilleries it contains overpowers it. This ultimately makes the malt too expensive for me. I'm having a hard time with the points.
нос 86 · вкус 83 · финиш 84
Together with two friends, we tasted this whisky on December 27, 2025. This is my initial and current impression, and this may of course change in the coming weeks and months. The bottle was freshly opened. However, I must currently say that I find The Peat Chronicles very weak. The smell of smoke in the nose is subtly present, but by no means as noticeable as some previous speakers have described. I was also surprised that a smoky whisky should still have a fairly strong smokiness after 27 years. The tasting confirmed my suspicion that the smoke is present, but remains very, very subtle in the background, which is quite fitting for an old Islay whisky. The whisky is largely closed off on the nose. Subtle, so-called smoke, a touch of chocolate, a touch of wood. And that was it. Tasted neat, it was also closed in the mouth, but sharp, unpleasantly sharp, even though it wasn't my first whisky that evening. You can taste the spiciness of the cask, however the whisky lacks any depth in the mouth, even after almost 30 seconds in the mouth. The departure was brief and swift, leaving no lasting impression. Again, no lasting depth and no long, perhaps even smoky, finish. As I said, this is my first impression of this bottling. I don't want to give them a final assessment, as one should give a whisky more time and more chances. If this were my final conclusion, I would not be able to understand the price of around 280 euros and, with a great deal of goodwill, would give the whisky about 80 points on Whiskybase, actually rather less. But perhaps it will develop further in the bottle. ---------------------------- Update from January 6, 2026 After a second tasting, it must be clearly stated that this whisky definitely needs time. At least 45 minutes to one hour of resting in the glass is necessary. This time I even gave him about an hour and a half. And yes, that made a significant difference. Overall, the whisky is very well made and has many of the qualities one would expect from a truly old whisky. Dark chocolate, leather, tobacco, supported by the ever-present but subtle smoke. It also features notes of an old gentleman's room, dust, slightly musty hints, and a spicy, dry finish. These flavors are present, cleanly developed, and absolutely on point. However, they want to be discovered. This is not a quickie. This whisky needs time, attention, and a good part of an evening. And I think the real problem in the whole thing is ultimately myself. At least for now. Because although I can objectively recognize and appreciate these aromas, they simply don't appeal to me at the moment. The whole thing feels too "old", too musty, too deep, too heavy to me. That's simply not to my personal taste at the moment. For lovers of precisely this characteristic, however, this bottling should be absolutely worthwhile. Those who appreciate highly mature whiskies with leather, tobacco, dark depth and a restrained but clear smoky note will very likely be happy here. I'm curious to see how the whisky develops in the coming months. However, one thing is certain: If you are looking for a really well-matured, old whisky that still has a clean smoky note despite being 27 years old, this is a great choice.
shop info: "Whisky from Ardbeg and Laphroaig, combined in a peat-laden blended malt. The Peat Chronicles 1997/2025 was selected locally by the Wu Dram Clan and deemed legendary. This powerhouse is 27 years old, 55.6% ABV, and available in 229 bottles exclusively for the German market. The legendary blend spent its final six years in Premier Cru Bordeaux barriques and contains components produced within the first year of the Ardbeg Distillery's reopening. The stuff Islay dreams are made of. And what Ruben wrote about that: https://www.whiskynotes.be/2025/blends/peat-chronicles-27-years-murray-mcdavid-germany/